Giving 2.0™ Guide: Corporate Philanthropy Models and Programs

Overview

Corporate philanthropy takes myriad forms, including but not limited to cash contributions, grants, in-kind donations, workplace giving, social sponsorships, cause-related marketing and pro bono services. Corporate philanthropy is typically distributed through a corporate foundation, directly through the company and its various divisions or departments via a corporate giving program and/or through direct gifts of products and services. Corporate giving made up 4 percent ($21.08 billion) of total giving ($485 billion) in 2021, a 23.8 percent increase from 2020.

“Creating programs that are both effective philanthropy and strategic for the company is often difficult in practice. The challenge for a company in deciding whether to engage in philanthropy, and if so, what form that effort should take, is to develop a philanthropic program that provides both meaningful social benefits, and at the same time, enough benefits to the company to justify the cost.”

-Laura Arrillaga-Andreessen, Stanford GSBGEN 580, 2021

Corporate Foundations and Corporate-Advised Funds

A corporate foundation is a private foundation that derives its grantmaking funds primarily from the contributions of one profit-making business. While this type of company-sponsored foundation often maintains close ties with the parent company, it is a separate legal organization, sometimes with its own endowment, and is subject to the same rules and regulations as other private foundations. 

Some companies choose to use the proceeds from their venture investments to endow their foundations. For example, in 1993, Cisco took a small equity position in Cascade Communications. When Ascend Communications acquired Cascade Communications in 1997, Cisco sold its position for $64 million. Then-president and CEO John Morgridge decided this money would be used to create the Cisco Foundation. Similar to other private foundations, corporate foundations must also adhere to the “payout rule” by annually paying out 5 percent of the value of their assets from the preceding year. Since corporate foundations generally make grants based on annual contributions from a parent company, they typically retain relatively few assets. Thus the ratio of giving to assets among corporate foundations tends to be much higher than in the foundation sector as a whole.

Other companies have created corporate-advised funds, supporting external organizations or private foundations through allocations of pre-IPO stock. EBay was the first company to adopt this model through then-president Jeff Skoll’s collaboration with Peter Hero, at the time CEO of Community Foundation Silicon Valley, by creating a donor-advised fund with pre-IPO stock. While groundbreaking at the time, corporate-advised funds have since become a common model for funding the endowments of corporate foundations. 

Shareholder Foundation Model

A shareholder foundation represents a convergence of the philanthropic and economic models, wherein a for-profit business transfers part of its ownership to a foundation, often the business’s associated corporate foundation. This move is often made to protect the longevity of a business and to prioritize philanthropy in its long-term strategy. This model has been prevalent in Europe for decades, but is newly popular in the US as well.

For example, Patagonia is in the process of making such a shift. The Patagonia Purpose Trust now owns 100% of Patagonia’s voting stock. In addition, Yvon Chouinard, owner of Patagonia, donated 100% of his non-voting stock to an environmental nonprofit. This means that a significant portion of Patagonia’s profits each year will go directly towards addressing climate change. Though Patagonia will remain a for-profit business, its governance will be increasingly stewarded by philanthropic principles.

Corporate Giving Programs  

These are internal grantmaking programs established and administered within a for-profit company, largely driven by internal stakeholders. These programs do not have separate endowments; their expenses are planned as part of the company’s annual budgeting process and are typically funded with pretax income. Corporate giving programs afford companies more discretion about where to give and how much, since they are not subject to IRS foundation regulations. These programs can take many forms, including, but not limited to:

  • These are contributions of products, services, expertise and cash equivalents. Although non-cash giving accounts for a smaller average proportion of companies’ total giving, many companies make in-kind contributions, in part because they can deduct the cost for purchasing (at cost) or manufacturing products. According to the 2021 Chief Executives for Corporate Purpose “Giving in Numbers” report, 44 percent of all corporate giving in 2020 was direct cash donated through corporate giving programs, 34 percent came from foundation gifts and 22 percent were in-kind donations.

    • Example: Alaska Airlines conducts community outreach by donating flights to nonprofit organizations to help them meet necessary travel needs.

    • Example: Google provides nonprofits with up to $10,000 USD of in-kind, free search advertising each month, including access to tools to help them build effective campaigns and track their marketing efforts.

    • Example: Oracle, Salesforce and Box offer both free and heavily discounted product editions to eligible nonprofits and schools, alongside pro bono consulting services and capacity building opportunities.

  • Workplace giving contributes an estimated $5 billion to U.S. nonprofits each year. Some of the more popular workplace giving programs offered by corporations include:

    • Employee Matching Gifts: A corporation makes a donation to match its employees’ charitable contributions. Some employers run seasonal giving campaigns (e.g., during Giving Tuesday) and encourage employees to create an automatic payroll deduction to donate to the nonprofit of their choice, with the company matching that donation.

    • Volunteer Support Programs: Sometimes called “Dollars for Doers” or individual volunteer grants, these programs reward employees who choose to volunteer with a direct gift to a nonprofit of their choice. For instance, a company might offer a $250 donation to a nonprofit for every 15 volunteer hours invested by a company employee.

  • Cause-related marketing is a mutually beneficial collaboration between a corporation and a nonprofit designed to promote the corporation's sales and the nonprofit’s social mission.

    • Example: American Express first coined the term “cause-related marketing” in 1983 to describe its campaign to raise money for the Statue of Liberty’s restoration. American Express donated one cent to the restoration every time someone used its charge card. As a result, the Restoration Fund raised over $1.7 million and American Express card use rose 28 percent.

    • Example: In 2006, Gap became one of the founding apparel partners of (RED), a social marketing initiative conceived by U2's Bono and Bobby Shriver. The partnership is structured to benefit companies by increasing purchases of (RED)-branded products, such as red hoodies, while also increasing donations to the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Gap has contributed $10 million to the Global Fund and has encouraged customers to support the fight through its (RED) partnership product collections, which have heightened awareness of the AIDS pandemic.

  • More and more companies are integrating pro bono services into their corporate giving programs as another way to engage employees, while investing in their communities. Though the concept of lawyers completing pro bono hours to help litigants who would otherwise be unable to afford representation is familiar, pro bono services are not constrained to the legal field. Any field of business, from software developers to tutoring services, is able to offer pro bono services depending on their areas of expertise.

    • Example: The growing interest from both corporate programs and nonprofit organizations gave rise to the Taproot Foundation, which helps corporations design, implement and/or enhance their corporate pro bono offerings and connects them with potential nonprofit partners.

Improving Corporate Philanthropy Practices 

In 2012, the Council on Foundations released a seminal report, “Increasing Impact, Enhancing Value: A Practitioner’s Guide to Leading Corporate Philanthropy,” to advance the effectiveness of corporate giving. The guide offered original research and best practices, with the goal of strengthening the field of corporate philanthropy. The report highlighted the need to: 

1.

Create a new narrative for corporate philanthropy as an investment in society.

2.

Develop an inclusive “operating system” for philanthropic investment.

3.

Professionalize the field.

4.

Improve collaboration, communication and knowledge-sharing. 

5.

Mobilize “field-level” leadership behind this agenda.

References:

“Giving USA: The Annual Report on Philanthropy for the Year 2021,” Giving USA Foundation, June 2022,  https://givingusa.org/ (July 6, 2022)

You can learn more about the Cisco Foundation here: Cisco Corporate Philanthropy Case Study.

Arthur Gautier and Joel Bothello, “What Happens When a Company (Like Patagonia) Transfers Ownership to a Nonprofit?”, Harvard Business Review, https://www.google.com/url?q=https://hbr.org/2022/10/what-happens-when-a-company-like-patagonia-becomes-a-nonprofit&sa=D&source=docs&ust=1666641626431486&usg=AOvVaw0gIMdC2GOQGQsJ2mhbBOYA (October 24, 2022

“Giving in Numbers: 2021 Edition,” CECP, https://cecp.co/home/resources/giving-in-numbers/?tid=1643 (July 6, 2022).

 Julia Travers, “Playing to Strengths: How Alaska Airlines Ties Giving to the Power of Flight,” Inside Philanthropy, https://www.insidephilanthropy.com/home/2018/11/1/playing-to-strengths-how-alaska-airlines-ties- giving-to-the-power-of-flight (November 1, 2018).

 “Guide to Workplace Giving,” Charity Navigator, https://www.charitynavigator.org/__asset__/_etc_/Guide_To_ Workplace_Giving3.pdf (August 4, 2021). 

 Sue Adkins, Cause-Related Marketing: Who Cares Wins (Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1999). 

 “Gap Marks (RED)’s 10th anniversary in the fight against AIDS,” Gap, July 26, 2016, https://www.gapinc.com/en-us/articles/2016/07/gap-marks-red-s-10th-anniversary-in-the-fight-agai (August 4, 2021). 

 You can learn more about other Gap Inc. corporate philanthropy initiatives here: Gap Inc. Corporate Philanthropy and The Gap Inc. P.A.C.E. Program

 “Corporate Services,” Taproot Foundation, https://taprootfoundation.org/corporate/ (July 6, 2022).

 https://cof.org/content/increasing-impact-enhancing-value-practitioners-guide-leading-corporate-philanthropy

 “Leading Corporate Philanthropy,” Council on Foundations, 2013, https://www.cof.org/program-initiative/leading-corporate-philanthropy (August 9, 2021).